Book Review: My Luck

My Luck, by Mel Todd. I’m going to have to give credit where credit is due and give it three out of five stars, because it is a very engaging and reasonably well-written alternate history urban fantasy. But it is first and foremost a very well-written dystopia, and I’d advise you only go looking for it if you want something that starts out enjoyable if puzzling on first read… then you sit back and think the worldbuilding over, and get very angry.

So we have a main character nicknamed Cori Catastrophe because things constantly go spectacularly and bizarrely wrong around her. On top of that her brother died mysteriously, her parents effectively abandoned her (moving her into a separate apartment and just providing some money every month to live on to a fourteen-year-old is abandonment and horrible neglect, by any legal definitions, never mind the whole “never come near your new little brother who doesn’t even know he has a sister”), and she keeps finding very weird dead bodies. To the point every emergency service in town knows exactly who she is and that they’d better send Homicide if she says someone’s dead. On top of that, her job prospects are Slim, son of None, because she has no money and no magic. But she’s worked her way through school and into an EMT program, because she’s determined to get herself to a place where she’s employed, okay, and never dependent on her parents for anything else ever again.

Good. Excellent. I admire the determination, work ethic, and guts to play a lousy hand well, which is pretty much why I got the book. But after you get past the spot the sample ends… well, people’s actions and choices get progressively weirder and “waaaaait a minute, this makes no sense.”

One of the reviewers on Amazon said the main character was dense. I would not actually say so – or more accurately, I would say she’s no more dense than every other adult in contact with her. From the moment her twin brother dies… seriously, that is a hideous, sudden, unexplained death in a world where magic, spontaneous and deadly magical eruptions, and Murphy’s Luck curses are known to exist. And no one seems to have checked the one person holding the body when EMS got there? Then, or in all the years later when catastrophe after catastrophe follows in her wake like ducklings after breadcrumbs? And she manifests multiple symptoms that, if you pay attention, mean she may be constantly fueling magic. Yet in the whole book we get one person constantly muttering to her that she ought to get checked – but he’s a mage that always speaks in Cryptic, and apparently never discussed this potential life-threatening already-may-have-killed-multiple-people uncontrolled problem with anyone.

As someone once put it, if your entire plot could be unraveled by someone putting a Post-It on a refrigerator door, you have a Problem.

Leaving aside the magic, the other characters in the book seem to have been constrained by the plot to act in a manner that left the main character isolated and alone for all these years. As the book goes on, we have one character after another admit that what Cori’s parents did was Horribly Wrong, but they didn’t want to step in because “you would have ended up in foster care and that would be worse, and you seemed to be handling it.”

…There are a heck of a lot of things said characters could have done besides getting social workers involved. They could have spoken to her parents. They could have showed up at Cori’s door themselves and taken her out grocery shopping. Offered an outing to a thrift store, “to see if there’s any neat treasures in our sizes”. Sent in the local church ladies to “help with spring cleaning”. Asked if she wanted to go over the day’s homework, for goodness’ sake. If the community thinks her parents’ treatment is wrong, the community ought to do something.

But then, overall, this is a sick society. It doesn’t look sick. It looks fairly functional, with most people doing reasonably fine. And yet.

If you’re a mage with anything beyond a little power – and you have no choice in becoming a mage, it’s something that happens to you, has been happening to people since the end of the U.S. Civil War – you are tattooed. On the face, where everyone can see it forever. Then required to go to college. And then required to serve the government in whatever way they see fit, for four to ten years depending on how powerful you are. Involuntary draft. No way around it. Trying to avoid it can and has gotten people hunted down and killed.

And this is supposed to be the United States of America.

What’s more, this tattoo-and-draft takes place all over the world – the UN makes the rules about that. Along with hunting down mages who slip through the cracks.

…Yeah, the idea of the UN having any say over how the U.S. treats its own people makes me sputter in disbelief, too. I’m going to blame Marvel movies here; I think a lot of people have completely missed how the UN actually works. For now let’s just hit the UN Security Council, who’d be the only part of the body who could even threaten to try something this stupid. It consists of fifteen members; ten elected on a regional basis who serve for two years at a time, and five permanent members, being the U.S., Russia, China, France, and the U.K. Permanent members can block any Security Council resolution with just one veto.

Forget human rights violations. Does anyone – anyone with a functioning brain – think the leadership of any of these countries would want their mages permanently identifiable? On the battlefield, in espionage, as targets for literal corporate headhunting?

Right.

Now back to those human rights violations. Tattooed for identification. Does this remind you of anything? Hmm?

And not everyone should be in college. Seriously. It takes a certain mindset, skill base, and being a bit cracked in the head, sometimes. If you really want to train people for their own safety you’d be better off doing it as part of a trade school or locally-offered instruction.

Except I checked a few samples ahead in the series (trying to see if things got better, nope) and the laws around the draft in book 5 once they’ve got you are… well. They make me ill. In short, the instructors decide if you pass or fail, and if you threaten them – and they get to decide what is threatening – they are legally allowed to kill you. No plea, no legal defense, no nothing.

One of the mages in a group marked as “troublesome and set up to deliberately fail” is a woman with Down’s Syndrome.

…I cannot express my honest opinion of that without resorting to foul language. Because what. Someone knows this woman. Someone will miss this woman. Someone will raise holy hell to find out what happens if she ends up dead. And this is supposed to have been going on for decades? No. No way. Civil rights groups would have torn things to pieces.

(Also, minor detail, but in the alternate history’s WWII, mages were transporting a nuke and dropped it on Hiroshima instead, and Japan has cut off almost all contact with the U.S. since. I hate to point out the obvious, but that’s not how being on the losing side of a war works, people.)

So. Yeah. Excellent idea, nicely-drawn characters, stupid stupid magical dystopia. Sigh.

Edit Note: Oky, the title is My Luck, the series is Twisted Luck. Beware the perils of writing with your arrrrgh up….

50 thoughts on “Book Review: My Luck

  1. Foreshadowing can be tricky.

    First your walking a tightrope between [blatantly telling the reader what is coming] vs [impossible to predict ass-pull]

    Then if you want a striking twist, when you actually approach the reveal, you need to lay enough groundwork that the reader can easily understand what they are saying and what the implications are.

    A long info-dump kinda detracts from the shocking one-liner.

    Then the actual reveal needs to outlandish enough that it is clear why it was never revealed before.

    Otherwise it just looks like they were overlooking the obvious for years.

    It takes a lot of tweaking to the story and also to the worldbuilding.

    Like

  2. :blinks: I’m still stuck on “must go to college.” There wasn’t a big push for that until post-WWII, yet here it’s after the Civil War? That…. Guys. That’s not how real history *worked*. If you want to make it alt-history, then you *need a good idea of what history actually IS* already. And the whole “go to college” thing happened AFTER WORLD WAR II, not after the ACW. What?!

    I don’t think Marvel is the only one to blame, just the most recent Big Thing to do it. There were and are other stories that did the same thing, and I remember 12 or so years ago people throwing a fit about a treaty that would have negated the 2A if it had been signed and the people signing it bypassed the Senate or got a majority there (the treaty wasn’t signed, thankfully). Most people don’t pay attention to that, and the trope of “one world government” is so engrained no one really stops to poke it and see if it would *work.* I personally head-canon that Ross in the MCU was *far* overstepping his authority on a U.N. treaty that hadn’t been ratified and wouldn’t have meant jack squat if he hadn’t used it like a bludgeon, as people feared that real life U.N. treaty would be used. But the political will and lawfare to stop and remove Ross would probably have been so extensive as to take until Thanos arrived to even get any traction.

    (Yes, I watch politics enough I can fill in these types of gaps all too easily and depressingly. Works well for writing, not so much for happiness, unfortunately.)

    But I’ve seen “the U.N. said so” pulled so many times by people who *should* know better…. I wish it was surprising. It’s certainly *annoying.* But it’s more of a “must be Tuesday” thing for me at this point. Same for the tattoos – and THAT has been used by so many already, including by the X-Men (Bishop has an “M for Mutant” tattoo over one eye for identification not for fun), that I just roll my eyes. :sigh:

    Liked by 4 people

    1. All sorts of fiction indulges in all sorts of license with law for reasons from drama to stupidity.

      The Law of Superheroes by James Daily and Ryan Davidson does a good job talking about it, though it does have the usual lawyers-talking-about-superheroic issue: they use the fiction to discuss real-life law, and not to discuss what impact superpowers would have on the law. They mention that the FAA only covers flying with a device. True. I could also add the precedent of one of England’s last witchcraft cases; the judge dismissed it at the earliest stages, because the witnesses told him that they saw the woman flying through the air, and he retorted that flying through the air is not a crime. But — well, how much trouble flight causes will influence how quickly the law changes, but it will be pretty quick.

      In Through A Mirror, Darkly — hmm, I don’t remember if I actually mentioned it in text, but the government actually has a list that encompasses virtually every law-abiding power. This is not because they are required to register or anything, but because they sought licenses to fly. Every power can fly, and virtually all of them want to, so the government requires a license.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. On people flying? Probably treat them as Ultralights. Which are daylight flying only, stay below 18,000 feet (Class A airspace) and outside of the controlled airspace around airports (Class B, C, and D). They may or may not require a human flier to not do so over congested areas or assemblies of people like ultralights have to.

        In one universe from the Transformation Story Archives where some people changed into forms able to fly, they also wore transponders after one person caused a crash by being sucked into a jet engine while a plane was landing.

        Liked by 3 people

      2. Yeah, some people might be able to reach the height that jet liners can and stay there without help, but most would be in paraglider territory if only by the expedient of not being equipped by their powers to breathe where the air is too thin!

        Liked by 2 people

  3. Oh. Oh dear…

    :pales drastically:

    What the hell was the author smoking when they wrote this?

    No, I don’t want any of it for myself. I want to know what it is and where they get it from so that I can eradicate the stuff!

    Yeah, no. I do not want to live in that world. And I have a feeling that I would maybe get a third of the way through the book myself before throwing it at the wall…

    Liked by 7 people

    1. You and me both.

      Part of the reason I wrote this is the character is engaging, you want to see her succeed… but then the obstacles become too obviously “author threw this in to make character’s life worse”. Because if this was happening in a real society there would be all kinds of mayhem.

      Liked by 7 people

      1. I have read writing advice that you can always make a character’s life worse through dumb luck, just not better. Nope! Besides its being no fun, there comes a point where you say, no, the author is just hosing people down.

        Liked by 3 people

      2. And why should you only use luck to make your character’s life worse? I do not believe that’s good advice at all!

        That may be one of the reasons I refuse to touch canon Worm. I already live in a world where things go wrong more often than not. Why the hell would I read about a world where the only light at the end is a magma plume?

        Liked by 2 people

      3. LiTo give all the credit I can, here — and bearing in mind I probably haven’t seen the same people talking about it as Mary — I<i>think</i> the origin of this advice might be not “your character should never experience good things” (although some people may have run off with it for that purpose) but “your story will be more satisfying if the wins rely predominantly on the characters’ own efforts, so if luck plays a major role in the plot, it helps to make it the source of problems rather than their solution.”

        I agree that mixed luck is still better and was in fact noting John Flanagan’s use of the effects of both good and bad luck (as well as preparation) on both the good and bad characters literally yesterday, but I think there is some reasonable food for thought in this one all the same, especially if (as is the case for much writing advice) it was formulated to address an observed tendency.

        Heh. Chesterton said that a lot of things wrong with the world resulted from individual virtues running amok, in isolation from the balancing ones in the full Christian framework, and I think this is also what happens to a lot of writing advice.

        …That said, there are people in real life who seem to just get constantly hammered in terms of luck, and I guess it could have been related to that.

        Liked by 2 people

      4. That’s true. Mixed luck is the best kind. But I wasn’t really talking about luck being central to the plot either.

        Just, using luck in general in stories. You shouldn’t be afraid to have a character say, win the lotto, for example. As long as whatever good or bad luck happens gets used properly.

        All that money could end up going into replacement parts for that character’s car or ship.

        Liked by 2 people

      5. Because it’s more dramatic that way. As long as it’s plausible, to be sure.

        Use less chance-based means to make your character’s life better and worse.

        Like

      6. Bad luck can happen!

        …Once. Twice starts a pattern. The third time, you better have found the one handing out misfortune and have a plan to Deal With It.

        Liked by 3 people

      7. That I can agree with. If you are going to be dealing in luck in a sto9ry, then there had better be mixed luck in there!

        For all parties involved. Because Bad Guys can have both good and bad luck too.

        Liked by 2 people

      8. It was luck that brought the Ring to Bilbo and luck that helped Frodo eventually destroy it, though he had been worn down to the point that he couldn’t actually cast it into the fire. No one said even the good luck had to make things easy! And some luck can be good in a macro sense and really bad in the micro or personal sense….

        Liked by 1 person

      9. And this kind of thing is at least half the reason I read this blog: I know darn well I have a tendency not to think through the implications of things (in one of my older stories, I ended up having to nuke a small country when what should have been a blindingly obvious plot hole was pointed out to me), and your commentary gets me to do more of that thinking. I’m not sure I would’ve recognized some of the issues you point out here, especially societal, and considering that at least three of my immediate-future projects heavily rely on societal pressures… yeah. Definitely brings up things I need to think about.

        Liked by 2 people

    2. I read a lot of fanfiction. There are many decent stories, many more that are not so decent. I couldn’t tell you just how many I’ve read that, after finishing reading it, I was very grateful that life doesn’t work like that.

      Sure, some of them were good stories. But to say that people don’t generally bother digging into their own story’s lore, or the implications of said lore…

      About like coming across a shallow mass grave, perhaps? Old enough to be naught but bones left. The greenery is lush (excellent fertilizer, you know), the birds are singing, and people are tramping through, praising the scenery- and pointedly ignoring the skulls grinning from under the bushes. The flowers growing in the protection a ribcage offers. Scars on the trees. The pressure of unseen eyes, measuring their every move. Birds taking flight for anywhere but here. A laugh that doesn’t seem to have been uttered by any of their party…

      No, some people really don’t like to dig. Not even for things that are practically crawling out of their graves on their own… and looking for company.

      Liked by 4 people

      1. Scenes, I can do. They’re fun. Plot lines, on the other hand… a conspiracy theorist’s cork board might be easier to untangle. I think the line warps time and space. Schrodinger’s Timeline…

        Liked by 3 people

      2. :turns green:

        Yeah, not a very pretty image.

        I would like to think that I am good enough at my worldbuilding that I would actually build on that grisly image.

        Then again, I want my worlds to have wonder in them, so I’m more likely to have a field where there’s a unicorn in the background with the point of its horn to the ground as it lays the unquiet spirits to rest and brings them peace…

        Liked by 2 people

      3. …Now I just need something where a Unicorn living in a graveyard makes sense…

        …Or, could I use this for that ghost story idea…?

        Maybe if they were working on a stable it would work?

        Liked by 1 person

      4. Okay, this is really kind of odd, take or leave as you see fit, but….

        In Chinese folklore, and a lot of the rest of Asia, one of the most dangerous ghosts is that of a girl killed before her wedding. And many of those would be virgins.

        I could see a unicorn moving in near or even into a graveyard to take care of all those virgin ghosts!

        Like

  4. Ah-ha! I just double checked, yeah. Mel Todd had good execution, but as serious case of Does Not Think Through. Now, if you want to see an example of a good ‘magic introduced in the 1800’s’ I would recommend the Hidden Legacy by Ilona Andrew’s. Good, thought through worldbuilding, and I can see how it would work with the cultures front and center in the books.

    I have another series by Mel Todd that she wrote, where characters all over the world are suddenly becoming were-creatures. My main issue and why I never even started the last book, is that none of the books have an ending. They just, have a stopping point. I know sequel baiting. This isn’t even that at this point. This isn’t a cliffhanger. It just <i>stops,</i> like it was one long book. And the epilogues are, somehow, even worse about that sort of thing. Since I had gotten the last book on a preorder, I did flip to the epilogue. Yeah, yeah that <i>was not an ending to a series.</i> I probably would have read the book anyway, if the first chapter hadn’t been literally rehashing several scenes from the previous book from a brand new perspective. Literally. Nothing was added. Interesting premise, good execution, did not stick the landing at all.

    Plus, the way the earth antagonist managed to perfectly orchestrate the media and public opinion was unrealistic for his stated position, even if you include the fact that he was apparently running a gang. Maybe especially then. Overall, books I’m probably not going to reread.

    Liked by 2 people

  5. In addition to GI bill, etc., the UN is also basically a post WWII thing.

    Strictly speaking, what the American history books label the Allies was also the United Nations.

    ACW’s political and social circumstances were not very aligned that way, either.

    Furthermore, if you have a significantly intrusive change that early, it might be reasonably expected to change the circumstances of WWII a smidgen. Conscription and face tattoos is probably that degree of intrusive.

    Modern approaches to ‘teaching’ history can perhaps be blamed a lot, but it is not like everyone has a deep historical interest, and there are also limits on how much your readers will allow you to explain stuff. OTOH, Correia’s Grim Noir comes to my mind as a reasonably defensible execution.

    Stuff as described could perhaps be more credible as in universe historical revisionism, with conspiracies and magic. That feels like an approach that would be less not more palatable. It would probably be better to just do the history and social mileau plausibly in the first place.

    Liked by 2 people

  6. I’ve discovered that, surprise surprise, I have a rant about universities in me,

    Sources include wikipedia, but those bits seemed credible, and fit with what I have in other ways, so.

    Universitas. Schools which taught one or more of law, medicine, or theology, in addition to the seven classical liberal arts. Which are the four, astronomy, music, geometry, and arithmetic, and the three, logic, rhetoric, and grammar.

    At least three of the seven are in modern mathematics. Logic, arithmetic, adn geometry. Astronomy has long had mathematical elements. Music was apparently more descriptively harmonics, and probably had content overlap both with modern academic music theory, and with modern electrical engineering.

    I’m more skeptical of schools in fiction than I used to be. How does the society validate the curriculum as useful? How do the students get selected, and developed, and what does their time cost do to the economy? How do people in the society change their behavior towards a graduate on confirming they have whatever summary on paper. I can have questions about all of these. How persuaded am I by the author?

    I’m willing to buy universities, colleges, vocational schools, or other tertiary or secondary training as /the/ place to learn magic.

    I’ve been studying how universities really work, or really worked. As I have learned more, while I accept stuff for a enjoyable read, I am also a bit fussier.

    And, yeah, there are several things in your description that very much sound off to me for a functioning university, that is doing the other training programs in a sane and tolerable way. (Though there is a joke about whether sanity can have anything to do with any field of academic theory. Historically, some of the personalities seem to have been a wee bit extreme at times. )

    Liked by 4 people

  7. No 14 yr old, in the history of ever, having suffered that size of traumatic and life changing event is “handling it” I garuntee she is suppressing like Mad. The fact that all that happens and she seems to be “handling” should be an alarm bell. Where does she even have space to grieve?

    Liked by 2 people

    1. See, the way to handle that is that “everyone knows” or they think she *wants* to live like that and her parents are suffering through it. In an “everyone knows” situation, you can have “we know but we don’t know how to involve ourselves without making matters worse,” or “we know, but we were terrified your parents would *hurt you* if they knew we helped,” or of course “we know but you Totally Deserved It.” And of course, you could have the flip side of Loving Parents Dealing With A Troubled Child, which would have answers like: “you were an ungrateful child/did something wrong and your loving parents couldn’t/wouldn’t let you run off like you wanted so they did this for you,” or “you were all traumatized and they just didn’t know how else to handle it, you shouldn’t be so hard on them,” and then some version of “you Totally Deserved It.”

      Though my above examples all rely on the neighbors paying attention, being involved with each other, and/or the local culture being close-knit enough for Mel’s situation to register. If none of that existed…. Depending on the neighborhood, Mel’s parents’ actions would fall under “none of my business (because you Don’t Mess With The Neighbors Here)”. And all of that would take some extra work to set up, too.

      Liked by 2 people

  8. Civil rights groups would have torn things to pieces.

    Heck with “civil rights groups,” the combined power of J Random Americans and their just discovered to be a mage relatives would freakin’ destroy it.

    There is no way in HECK that they manage to brain wash folks well enough that there are no defectors after the enslavement term ends, so you’ve got a trained counter power structure right there.

    Liked by 4 people

    1. Never mind Civil Rights groups. This setting is primed for the apocryphal story about a Chinese rebellion, “Brothers I have news, we are late.” Which would get them executed, so why not go all in?

      “Why are we suffering cyclical magical rebellions all over the world for the last two centuries?”

      Liked by 6 people

  9. This sounds like someone read Worm and chose to use the basic plot. Seriously, I walled it just after the Main Villain had Everything go his way. As in won in practically every way. Wildbow may have made some compelling characters, but his worldbuilding makes RWBY post Monty Oum look fantastic. And RWBY has plot Canyons rather than holes after Monty.

    Like

Leave a comment